Archive for May, 2012


Wish Us Luck!

Coming to a town near you!

This weekend I, (dba Leatherback Labs) as well as my partners in crime ScrawnyStrange Productions and 619 Villain Productions are heading to San Diego put our bid in their leg of the 48 Hour Film Project. The down and dirty is this: Our team is going to have only two days to make a short film using elements the 48 Hour Film Project provides. It’s going to be fast and furious, and it’s my first ever 48 Hour Film Project I’m going to be working on in a writing capacity.

As such, this guy is going to be off the grid for the next couple of days. I did a “test run” last week, writing up an 8-page script made up of sample elements to make sure the skills are sharp. Here’s hoping I bring the A-game especially now that there’s real pressure. Most of the team has worked together before, so hopefully some of the chemistry will be built in.

See you guys on the other side,

–Flobo

 


48 Hour Filmmaker: San Diego 2012


							

Love Sucks…But It’s Important

Yoyo, what’s going on? It’s Flobo here with another post where we gab about the joys of creative writing.

You ever wonder about “romantic subplots” in films, television shows or books? You know, it could be the biggest blockbuster of the summer—complete with robots, aliens and their ilk—but somehow thirty minutes of the run time is devoted to the main character trying to court the other main character (usually of the opposite gender)? It’s funny that no one really finds this weird, even though if there were a true disaster going on there would be no time for a dinner date.

OK, I’ll date you if we survive. Deal?

Well, the reason for this is two fold:

1) Demographics. You may or may not know this, but when it comes to movies most studios track audience responses across something what’s known as the “Four Quadrants”; older and younger males, and older and younger females to be exact. While there’s no problem in assuming that guys (with waaaay too much time on their hands) will show up for a three hour movie about giant robots that pose as automobiles, studios get a little skittish about fearing that ONLY guys will buy tickets. Even though we watch movies with our own eyes, movie going is really a social activity and so it would behoove a flick to appeal to both women and men. Modern trends nowadays say otherwise,  but classically it was believed that a love subplot would make the bitter pill easier to swallow for ladies .

Because men don’t want love in their explosions, apparently.

2) Likeability. Romantic subplots are a (depending on how you look at it) clever or cliched way to make your main character likeable. A hardened tough guy mowing down a bunch of people with a machine gun? Disturbing. A hardened tough guy mowing down a bunch of people with a machine gun because they kidnapped his wife? Completely understandable.

Fighting never solved anything. Except you know, getting chicks….

You’d be hard-pressed to find any kind of film, or novel, or television show without SOME love story. We are our most vulnerable when we open up and “fall in love” with somebody. Pretty much your brain throws logic out and throws the rest of your feelings in a blender. You are perpetually out of your comfort zone, and your actions reflect that. When a a fictional character goes through same ordeal, we can instantly relate. We all have that memory of wanting to stop that person we have a crush on and tell them how we feel (while they are boarding a flight to somewhere exotic, most likely) or trying to understand and appreciate our beloved’s culture so we can understand their customs…

Or have I just watched this movie too many times…?

Now with the exception of “Love, Actually”, “Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World”, “Hitch”, and to a lesser extent “Slumdog Millionaire”, romantic movies just don’t do it for me. My heart is too cold to appreciate romantic movies because I usually have outright issues with plausibility. Confessing my love in the pouring rain would probably get me nothing more than a restraining order, not an epilogue scene containing my wedding.

Not that I WANT a wedding or anything.

Now with that said, usually my long form writing has some sort of romantic sub plot going on. It’s just the rules of the road. The challenge (and the fun part) is finding ways to keep this “necessary evil” fresh.  What do I mean? Well check out the normal Romantic Comedy Formula:

Meet Boy. Meet Girl. Boy bumps into Girl. Boy and Girl pine for each other. Boy goes out on date with girl. They fall in love. Some complication tears Boy and Girl apart. Boy and Girl are miserable. Boy chases down Girl, confesses love. Girl accepts. Fade to black.

And if it’s a Tyler Perry film, add a cross dressing grandma and a song number!

There’s plenty of ways to mix that up, so try to experiment. Now back to blockbuster movies adding romantic subplots. A lot of times I feel they don’t make the story stronger at all.

Remember that time you cared whether or not Nic Cage got the girl? Me neither.

As always, keep writing

–Flobo

Hey everyone, Flobo here!

As it is one of my more visited posts, most people who read this blog know how much I DISLIKE the Caped Crusader  in Batman, click the link to allow me to count the ways. Today (since I’m such a DC comic junkie) I want to do the Herculean Task in defending the Man of Steel while discussing what it all means for your writing. Ready? Let’s do this.

Superman’s new “Relaunch” costume is amazing. It kind of makes forget about his red undies..

When most people (especially those who are not comic fans) think of the word “superhero” (Sidenote: A joint trademark from DC Comics as well as Marvel) they think of Superman, or a variation thereof. You know, super strength, flight, and a cool costume is all part of spectacle. Seriously, a web image search for the word superhero yields a bunch of Superman Clones. The Reader’s Digest version of the story goes like this: Last son of a dying planet, young Kal-El is shipped to Earth Moses-style and is adopted by a young couple living on a farm in Smallville Kansas. There, after learning about the customs of his adopted home-world, he becomes Superman in his adult age, a champion for the people he’s sworn to protect. He’s got strength, speed, invulnerability, ice breath, heat vision, and a moral code that we all could look up to. He was all about truth, justice, and the American Way!

And all was well.

Ask a comic book fan (or any fan of entertainment) about “Supes” and they would roll their eyes. “He’s too goody-goody,” I would hear some say. “He doesn’t get hurt,” others would chime in.

The latter isn’t quite true, because classically Superman was vulnerable to kryptonite as well as magic, and this doesn’t include the limitations lead inflicts on his X-ray vision (or a red sun on his powers wholesale). You could argue that Superman’s popularity came with the public’s perception of the country of which he landed. In the golden and silver age of comics, public opinion of the USA was pretty positive. We were established as a World Power, and the era of Pax Americana was in full swing. The conflict in Vietnam started a change with the public questioning our leaders about the decisions the government made. Of course this wasn’t the first time John Q. Public had issues with Uncle Sam, but  this was the television age (before the Internet and Social Media) where dissenting opinion could be broadcasted nationwide. What happened to media in general was that there was more and more cynicism added to the works of the day. For the record I’m not saying this is a “bad” thing, but for example “Taxi Driver” would NEVER would have been made as a television movie to follow “Leave It To Beaver”. Comics were no different, and we saw a rash of new characters with flaws and challenges that made Superman look like a cartoon character in comparison. The public at large were aware of the legend but didn’t find him “relatable”. It would be like trying to convert people into worshiping Zeus all over again. Guys and dolls raised eyebrows  at the “American Way”.

Another Superpower: Breaking Up large blocks of text

I think the people at DC Comics are trying to remedy this problem in the new line of Superman comics, but don’t take this post as an outright advertisement or anything like that. To me, there’s always something about Superman that people tend to overlook. Here is a child that got shipped to a far off land, and not only was he accepted by the public, he became a hero and role model for the denizens of Metropolis. This hits home for me as a first-generation American. Contrary to popular belief, America is the land of opportunity, but not promises. Success is not guaranteed, but I always pulled from Superman’s journey to “the top” as a sign of the possibility of social mobility in this country. Beyond that, Superman is damn near invulnerable but his struggle is more about how much influence does he inflict on the people he protects. You show up to handle every single conflict, and people depend on you to handle all of their problems. Do the opposite and pull back completely, and folks will lose faith (if not succumb to the situation at hand).  In the cartoon “Justice League”, Superman was chided by his teammates for not trusting them to handle a crop of bad guys, where as good ‘ol Supes claimed that his invulnerability served as the best “human shield” for the brunt of most attacks.

You just can’t win.

As a writer, one of my many challenges I have to do deal with is making heroes and villains entertaining. In the case of Batman, I would say it is very easy to write a story for a vigilante who puts on a cape because his parents death made him all weepy. Superman, from a writer’s standpoint is a tad more interesting. The questions I ask (What can bring down a superhuman? How much force should he use? How to make an entertaining story without destroying the character’s integrity?) are intriguing jumping off points, especially the former. Superman is prime to be one of my favorite character types in that he could be an  anti-villain. It’s one of the hardest types to pull off, but I think those kinds of stories are the most interesting. Having a character doing something that is considered good, but having other characters react to it as if it were evil is the stuff magic is made of. There are some comics that follow this route, and those are the most engaging. Then as a writer, to be able to turn that back on the audience, (e.g. showing how flawed their moral codes are) would just make me giddy. It’s always your goal as a writer to offer some sort of spectacle for someone’s hard earned cash, and that is definitely one way to do it.

For those of you who write characters in a series, we’ve talked before about making your characters “evolve” throughout each volume. In essence, your main characters have to “grow” or change. Sometimes however, after a couple of entries your characters may become “too big for their britches” and a reboot (or “back to basics” or “life-altering event”) is necessary. Like the creative teams on Superman, you are going to have to decide which aspects of your characters you want to keep, and which new elements you want to introduce to keep your heroes and your stories fluid.

Just don’t forget to remove the red underwear…

As always everyone, Happy Writing.

–Flobo

Hey everyone, Flobo here!

If you are like me, you probably would have no problem enjoying a nice pint of your favorite brew. Even if you don’t consume alcohol, your favorite beverage at the perfect time of day can either make you unwind or start you up, given the drink in question. So even though this post is centered around beer, you can substitute that for whatever beverage that tickles your fancy (coffee, wine, sparking water etc.).

I like beer. Done. End of story. What kind of beer? Though I have my preferences, I don’t really have a hardline as to which beers are acceptable for my consumption.

I don’t always fall for clever marketing campaigns. But when I do, I prefer Dos Equis (Amber)

I consider myself a beer connoisseur, being able to take elements of what I like from each beer I slam down my gullet. Now, there is another school of thought when it comes to beer, and that is The Beer Snob. The Snob, (which could be used pejoratively as well as a term of endearment) usually has a hard rubric as to what is considered “a good” beer . To me, the difference between a connoisseur and a snob comes down to one thing: How dogmatic the person is. Allow me to give you two scenarios:

1) I’m over at a friend’s house watching a big pro wrestling event (don’t judge me) on pay-per-view. At this point, it’s just me and about nine of “the boys”. Of course, seeing I didn’t chip in for the pay per view feed, I decide to bring a case of brewskis. I brought some of the mid-grade stuff, and when I showed up with that twelve-pack of Coronas the boys cheered. Six of us grabbed a bottle and three of us declined, leaving one guy to say:

Eww, Coronas taste like pee!

Embarrassing me via my gift of free beer aside, I asked myself what compelled this person to share his unsolicited choice of beer? It wasn’t like I called ahead and asked: “Hey Bro, I’m bringing the Mexican Pee, how do you feel?”. Of course this guy was the snob of the bunch, and needless to say, he didn’t take a bottle.

2) This is kind of the opposite of the first story. I was going to meet a friend of mine for dinner in Los Angeles one time and I ended up at a brew pub (essentially a grub spot that makes their own beer). Seeing that every beer on the menu was homegrown, I couldn’t ask for the stuff I was accustomed to. I could’ve thrown a tantrum and asked why the 50 cent special at the 7-Eleven wasn’t available but without so much as a protest I picked their house porter.

“Ew, this is like homemade pee!” Just wouldn’t have the same ring to it.

No, this article isn’t about defending store bought beer and trashing craft beer and snobs. Why? Well for one, most people are snobs about SOMETHING. Secondly, after living in the Southern California area for this long, I realize people are persnickety  just for the sake of identity.

Truth be told there’s  some beers even I will not touch…

Well, what does that have to do with your writing, whether it be novel, short stories or poetry? You see, just like how people are snobs about certain kind of beer, other folks are certainly snobs about reading some genres. Take me for example. I consider myself a fiction connoisseur, meaning I could  find something to enjoy in pretty much everything I read. Now, if I’m reading a mystery or police procedural (or watching it on television), I  instantly turn into a SNOB, and I judge the work against my lofty standards of what a good mystery should be. Because of this, there are very few crime shows that get my seal of approval (even though I watch a lot of them). Much like that guy at the pro wrestling party, there’s probably a few beers that meets his lofty standard and his seal of approval.

This can manifest itself to reviews and critiques of your work. Like me, I live or die on positive reviews of my books on sites like amazon.com. People out there are taking a chance on an indie author to begin with, they sure as rain are not going to risk it on a book with two or three  stars. That said, there are going to be reviewers that are going to read your book as simply a completed work, and others (due to targeted searching) are going to read your novels as a “snob” in their field of interest.

My dad is this way with animal documentaries. My mom was this way with romance novels. My brother is this way with stand-up comedians. It happens.

Sure, a snob’s review tends to be harsher if they pan your work, but if you win them over, they will sing your praises and are more likely to share with their friends. Why? Well, there is a counter-culture “underground” element to snobbery. It’s like that one friend who keeps getting you to listen to that indie rock band but as soon as the band makes it to radio your friend says they have become “mainstream”. Snobs are in fact experts in training. They want to feel that they are on the cutting edge and know about a certain thing that you do not.

That guy at the party was asked what his favorite beers and he rambled on about certain brews you could only get at a small brewer some hundreds of miles away. I bet you ten bucks that if he said that Corona was bad and that Tecate Light was the real king of Mexico, most guys at the party wouldn’t have put any stock in his opinion. You know, ad  hominem and all that.

Until next time, keep writing!

–Flobo

Bonus: Flobo’s Favorite Beers (in no order)

Dos Equis Amber
Presidente
Delirium
Shock Top
FREE Beer!

Hey everyone, Flobo here!

Today, I want to talk to you about something pretty cool. RPGs and Amusement Park rides! Wheeee! OK, more specifically:

Highway Patrol is getting out of hand…

This weekend I had the privilege to experience the Transformers: The Ride 3D twice over at Universal Studios Hollywood. While the small park sometimes hardly justifies having an annual pass, in this case it was the credential needed to grant you access. Now, I was NEVER a fan of the films. I always thought they were loud, overlong car wrecks with scores of inconsequential characters (Tyrese, anyone?). HOWEVER, the ride is a different beast altogether. I got to experience the ride both alone and with friends and let me tell you, the ride is AMAZING.

It’s like if The Simpsons Ride/Back To The Future Ride made sweet, sweet love to Disney’s Indiana Jones Ride and the baby came out wearing 3D glasses!

Here’s where it got interesting. Since I had such a good time on the ride, I actually had the desire to go back and give the movies a SECOND CHANCE.  Believe me, if you knew how much I disliked the movies, you’ll know that is a monumental feat. It got me thinking, sometimes supplemental material can help you with your main works. Supplemental material, whether it be a “free chapter” of your book, or  preview sketches, or exhibitions can do wonders to get those fringe people to engage with your brand.

The pre-ride “queue” has you going through a bunker at N.E.S.T., which is like the film’s in-world military branch. I now have a renewed interest in seeing the films to see how accurate the queue was in comparison to the film’s production design. I found this fascinating.

Oh, and if you think you have to develop a theme park ride to get people to check your work out as an author/poet/artist/ let me commend you on thinking big, but it’s unnecessary. Let me tell you about another franchise I skipped:

“Harry Potter” is one of the most successful franchises of all time. The stories, revolving around a wizard to be living in a world where magic is not only the norm, but taught and encouraged, the books and films have made literal billions of dollars  worldwide. My mom (bless her heart) gave me the first book as a child to read and I for the life of me could not get into them. I have no idea why, but it went over my head. Anyway, flash forward a couple of years and we now have:

Flobomore is coming soon.

Pottermore, a free online game based in the Harry Potter universe just recently opened the door to the general public “muggles” a couple of weeks ago. The game allows you to go through the books as if you were Harry Potter while picking up new information about them along the way. Admittedly it’s a clever way to release more material about the books instead of just releasing another volume (which may seem like a money-grab stunt) and making it into a “game” helps people who were intimidated by the page counts of some of the books (like yours truly) actually step up and give it a crack. I have no idea what’s going on in the game at the time of this writing, save for the fact the “Sorting Hat” says I’m in the House of Ravenclaw.

Good, because I hate those Gryffindor wusses…

Anyway, with “Pottermore”, it makes me kind of upset that I walked around the mountain instead of climbing it when it came to experiencing the books. Will I go back and try to now? Who knows? Although I give the creators props of putting that seed of regret in my head where there previously wasn’t one. Kudos.

Supplemental material can enhance or drum up interest for an upcoming (or undervalued) work. Try some different things and see if your material benefits from them.

–Flobo

Mexico International Film Festival

It seems as that my  screenplay version of “Legacy”, based off the short stories “Legacy” and “Progeny” is a finalist in this year’s Mexico International Film Festival screenplay competition. This really brought a smile to my face when I got the news today. Here’s hoping it does well. Not to jinx anything of course.

I’m planning a third collection of short stories to be released this fall/winter that will contain the third entry in the “Legacy” series. Stick around for details about that.

 
 
 

“Legacy” was submitted for consideration to the Mexican International Film Festival before it’s first rights agreement with Amazon Studios, which retains said rights until May 27, 2012.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 565 other followers

%d bloggers like this: